Escaping the iron cage: the instutional foundations of FM 3-24. counterinsurgency doctrine
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 213-230
ISSN: 0140-2390
26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 213-230
ISSN: 0140-2390
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 39, Heft 2, S. 213-230
ISSN: 1743-937X
In: Low intensity conflict & law enforcement, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 51-90
In: Low intensity conflict & law enforcement, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 51-90
ISSN: 1744-0556
In: Defence studies, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 302-317
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 918-919
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Parameters: the US Army War College quarterly, Band 45, Heft 1
ISSN: 2158-2106
In: The US Army War College quarterly parameters, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 113
ISSN: 0031-1723
In: Low intensity conflict & law enforcement, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 135-136
In: European journal of international security: EJIS, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 211-234
ISSN: 2057-5645
AbstractCombining the English School of International Relations and the study of grand strategy decision-making processes, this article investigates how dynamic density – growing volume, velocity, and diversity of interactions within international society – alters states' strategy formation processes. By contrasting the perspectives of structural realism and the English School on the role of dynamic density in world politics, the piece illustrates the strategist's dilemma: as global dynamic density in the international society increases, the ability of great powers to formulate coherent grand strategies and policies potentially decreases. Specifically, it contends that growing global dynamic density generates processual and substantive fragmentation in strategy formation. Building on a large body of elite interviews, US policy toward China – and the so-called US 'rebalance' to Asia – is used as a probability probe of the central idea of the strategist's dilemma. In conclusion, we contrast our findings with complex interdependence theory and examine their implications for 'great power management' (GPM) as a primary institution of international society. We argue that, by generating processual and substantive fragmentation in strategy formation, global dynamic density complicates GPM by hindering the capacity of great powers to manage and calibrate the competitive and cooperative dynamics at play in a bilateral relationship.
SSRN
In: Cyber Peace: Charting a Path Towards a Sustainable, Stable, and Secure Cyberspace. Scott Shackelford, Frederick Douzet, and Chris Ankersen (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Journal of peace research, Band 61, Heft 1, S. 119-133
ISSN: 1460-3578
Cyber operations ranging from deception and espionage to disruption and high-end degradation have become a central feature of modern statecraft in the digital age, yet we lack a clear understanding of how decision-makers employ and respond to cyber operations in times of crisis. Our research provides theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence for understanding how decision-makers react to cyber triggers and utilize cyber responses during crises. Specifically, we argue that the availability of cyber response creates off-ramps for non-escalatory engagement. Based on experimental wargames involving rival states with power parity in militarized disputes and randomized cyber triggers and response options, we find the availability of cyber response options reduces escalatory behavior via a substitution mechanism. In the absence of cyber response options, however, participants pursue more conventional, escalatory actions, regardless of the triggering mechanism. Our findings underscore how enhancing the availability of cyber response options might reduce strategic escalation risks and offer the space to bargain during periods of conflict.
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 212-234
ISSN: 1743-937X